Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder#14676
Conversation
|
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one. If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog-check label to it and you will stop receiving this reminder on future updates to the PR. |
msfroh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, thank you @shubhamsrkdev!
|
Oh, @shubhamsrkdev, could you please add an entry to lucene/CHANGES.txt? This is a fix that people will be able to experience. |
|
Thanks @msfroh! I have added the change log entry. |
# Conflicts: # lucene/CHANGES.txt
* main: (32 commits) update os.makedirs with pathlib mkdir (apache#14710) Optimize AbstractKnnVectorQuery#createBitSet with intoBitset (apache#14674) Implement #docIDRunEnd() on PostingsEnum. (apache#14693) Speed up TermQuery (apache#14709) Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. (apache#14701) Fix WindowsFS test failure seen on Policeman Jenkins (apache#14706) Use a temporary repository location to download certain ecj versions ("drops") (apache#14703) Add assumption to ignore occasional test failures due to disconnected graphs (apache#14696) Return MatchNoDocsQuery when IndexOrDocValuesQuery::rewrite does not match (apache#14700) Minor access modifier adjustment to a couple of lucene90 backward compat types (apache#14695) Speed up exhaustive evaluation. (apache#14679) Specify and test that IOContext is immutable (apache#14686) deps(java): bump org.gradle.toolchains.foojay-resolver-convention (apache#14691) deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit (apache#14692) Clean up how the test framework creates asserting scorables. (apache#14452) Make competitive iterators more robust. (apache#14532) Remove DISIDocIdStream. (apache#14550) Implement AssertingPostingsEnum#intoBitSet. (apache#14675) Fix patience knn queries to work with seeded knn queries (apache#14688) Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder (apache#14676) ...
|
@msfroh Should this be backported to branch_10x? |
Oh -- it probably should. I'll take care of that. |
|
@msfroh It looks like the CHANGES entry needs to move to 10.4 as well? |
--------- Co-authored-by: Shubham Sharma <shubharm@amazon.com>
|
Okay -- backported this and moved the CHANGES entry. Thanks, @jpountz! |
Description
Problem
Solution